Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
This picture is of the blocks on the port side of the cockpit. Note that the traveller control line is continuous, and can be adjusted from either side.
This picture showes the starboard side with the the traveller car offset for ease of entry into the cabin. The blue line is the main sheet, the green line is the reefing line, black the main halyard and the white line with blue flecks is the traveller control line.
Three problems with the Harken transom traveller system are: 1) only gets another ~4" of play at the track (i.e., less than 4" at the boom end), 2) doesn't solve the "clothes line" or behind-the-helm issues, and 3) costs nearly $500.
IMO the companionway solution obtains substantially more than 4" of boom end play and solves #2. Although, it also will probably be costly.
J.B. Manley Antares '85 FK/SR #4849 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees 36°29'58" -94°59'59"
Don's setup also eliminates reclining against the bulkhead. I'm wondering, at the cost of some traveler travel (!), if anyone has created a bridgedeck right aft of the companionway and mounted the traveler across the footwell but not across the seats. That would allow roughly the same travel as the stock traveler.
Wouldn't the angle of the sheet coming from the cockpit floor be a problem? How about a flying bridge mounted to the coamings just aft of the companionway? Presents headknocker, bimini and cleat angle problems, though.
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> It is all very frustrating. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> Yup... Although taking all things into consideration, including the fact that most of us have tiller steering--not a pedestal (so we're not standing at the centerline)--Frank probably got it just about right, especially when he replaced the original traveler with the one integral to the sternrail.
Dave Bristle - 1985 C-25 #5032 SR-FK-Dinette-Honda "Passage" in SW CT
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> How about a flying bridge mounted to the coamings just aft of the companionway?<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Now tyhat I've finally got the picture thing re-figured out, and have all the pictures posted that I want posted, I'll comment about two problems with the traveller set up I have.
1. As Brooke noticed, the traveller makes reclining against the cabin uncomfortable. We addressed that with a long, bending cushion that we picked up at Sail-Expo a few years ago. But that solution is practical when sailing.
2. When sailing with people who don't know how to sail, and don't know about traveller adjustments and main sheet adjustments, I find I'm reaching under legs to get to the main sheet, and that someone is sitting close to the traveller car making adjusting it difficult.
What I'm planning to do is "invent" a transom mounted traveller, thinks for your pics frank, and use that when I'm with people who don't know sailing stuff.
Don Peet c25, 1665, osmepneo, sr/wk The Great Sacandaga Lake, NY
As for the seat back thing, if you go back to the exploded view of the Jaguar 25 you will see that they appear to have a bracket/support that only goes between the two seats. We could fabricate that and have a very short traveler up front that would not interfere with the seats. I am beginning to wonder if a killer multi purchase boom vang led back to the cockpit isn't the answer. This guy has the beginning of a killer system.
Assuming that our goal is sail shape, it would provide the capabilities needed and then we could all relegate the transom traveler to positioning the boom relative to the centerline. I know this still doesn't cure the "pile o crap" at the back of the boat but maybe we should all get some new smaller mainsheet line with the supper core and reduce clutter by reducing overall bulk. There are certainly new smaller blocks that we could use for a purchase. BTW I looked at a 250 the other day and I'm surprised there isn't more discussion from them about their traveler, it was vestigial at best.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.