Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
I always set our handheld gps anchor alarm, but it's a pain to see on the small screen in the middle of the night, plus we have to leave the gps plugged in so it's restricted to the galley area.
Depends on how dependable the gps in your phone/tablet is. After that, I don't see why one is better than any other. Unless it crashes your phone. That could be problematic.
I tried one out for Free, sucked! It would show that we moved over 100' while the tablet was sitting on the dining table at home. Other features looked good: Ability to send a text msg if the scope was exceeded, run in the background, and many more features but in the paid version.
If it's the tablet that is unstable as far as GPS is concerned, agreed! no GPS app will work well.
The handheld wins at this point. But I only tried one app so far.
Two questions. First...what has been your experience with anchor alarms?....I can see the potential but just have not realized much benefit using my handheld GPS. A big advantage of our shallow draft (wing) is that we can go inside most of the big boys to get the most shelter from the shoreline if needed. Anchoring in 15+ ft our issue is that the distance to shore in many anchorages does not leave much tolerance for dragging which conflicts with a large swing diameter when the boat is hunting or the winds are shifting 180 as a front passes through. This is precisely, however, when we would like an alarm as our shorelines are mostly very unforgiving.
For the techno savy....how does smart phone GPS technology compare to handhelds? Sure anyone can calculate coordinates but dedicated GPS units (variable with price) take advantage of a lot of tricks to improve accuracy, reliability and speed of acquisition, including optimized electronics, simultaneous vs. sequential receipt of multiple signals and optimized algorithms, e.g., to use information on the carrier frequency, reduce multiple reflections and even management of round off error...And no I'm not talking about survey quality instruments. Anyone seen any tests comparing the two technologies?
Q1: Our sailing ground (excuse the pun) is Biscayne Bay. Skinny around the edges where we anchor. By skinny, I mean less than 6' is normal.
With a scope of 7 to 1, we should pay out 42' of line but typically run out at least 50.
So we have an area that is 100' in diameter, and we anchor about 1/2 mile off shore.
So there's not a lot of room to drag going to shore. North and South drag is no big deal if the anchorage is empty, but that's not the norm and sometimes the other boats drop the hook less than 200' from us and other boats.
Consequently, I set the handheld anchor alarm limit to the scope. This means we hear the alarm if the boat swings due to a wind shift, or current shift if light winds.
I would rather wake up several times during the night and go check if we are dragging or swinging rather than risk dragging 100'+ before the alarm. That could (and has) ended up having to make good on the drag at OhSillyHour.
Does that make sense?
Q2: That was the idea of installing an app or two. But didn't want to waste time testing on the water if it doesn't perform inside the house!
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by redviking</i> <br />...gps should be gps, accuracy is set by the feds...<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">Do smartphones utilize WAAS?
Good question Dave. WAAS will increase your accuracy/reduce error from 33 ft down to single digit feet. So that could be one cause of inaccuracy of your smartphone. I don't know about your GPS but if I try to get a fix inside my house I get an excuse: "GPS was unable to receive a usable satellite signal! Reorient the receiver or if inside, move to a location outside the building!" Somehow wood, carpets, shingles interfere with reception. Lastly, GPS uses a set of successive approximations when acquiring a signal, so over time as the receiver continues the acquisition process, accuracy improves. If I try to set a waypoint during this period my GPS will get my position wrong 10 times out of 10. Have you tried the app out on your patio or garden table after the app has finished acquiring.
gps should be gps, accuracy is set by the feds. sten <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Differing opinion here. I find that my tablet drops the GPS signal in a most amazing manner. Its really a big deal for me. If I set teh car navigation up before I leave home, for a trip to toronto, I usually lose GPS within 10 minutes, and won't regain it for at least half an hour. Absolute junk.
The tablet wants to switch to cell signal to triangulate its position, and will kick out a message that it has no cell signal since I don't have a data plan.
When it is working, It is usually accurate to within 10 feet.
I don't trust the GPS at all in this thing. GPS is not the same in all devices.
Location is key. My Iphone has no problem in the cabin with only fiberglass to contend with. I usually put it on the dash when driving, but it works pretty well on the console. Accuracy is about the same as my Garmin Nuvi and Etrex. The Etrex has better sensitivity in marginal locations
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> gps should be gps, accuracy is set by the feds. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Short answer: no; otherwise GNSS would be of no use in surveying or research. Correct answer: On open water where 5 to 10 m accuracy is all that is required I suspect different units will yield similar position estimates. Getting a position estimate, however, is only part of the issue. For example, dedicated units typically provide information on the estimated accuracy of position estimates (I don't know about smart phone apps). Although we are in a WAAS environment, we sometimes see uncertainty in position estimates as large as 30m (100') because for that 10 min. window, the satellites are poorly aligned for our region. Who cares if I'm just tracking my path but if I'm anchored 150m off a rock shoreline with a 40m scope, that 30m uncertainty makes a difference to me and my anchor alarm. I always average my anchor position but even then, uncertainty remains. My old Garmin 76 provided an accuracy estimate on the averaged position; my Oregon 450 does not. If headed out for the weekend I now often check configuation using [url="http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware_ts.asp"]Trimble planning[/url] software. Overkill, but easy to do.
Off the water, huge difference between units. In hiking in the local foothills my old Garmin 76 would almost always acquire a position estimate within a minute or less. I've left my Oregon sitting beside the 76 for 10's of minutes without it ever locking on sufficient no. of satellites to get a position.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by glivs</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> gps should be gps, accuracy is set by the feds. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Short answer: no; otherwise GNSS would be of no use in surveying or research. Correct answer: On open water where 5 to 10 m accuracy is all that is required I suspect different units will yield similar position estimates. Getting a position estimate, however, is only part of the issue. For example, dedicated units typically provide information on the estimated accuracy of position estimates (I don't know about smart phone apps). Although we are in a WAAS environment, we sometimes see uncertainty in position estimates as large as 30m (100') because for that 10 min. window, the satellites are poorly aligned for our region. Who cares if I'm just tracking my path but if I'm anchored 150m off a rock shoreline with a 40m scope, that 30m uncertainty makes a difference to me and my anchor alarm. I always average my anchor position but even then, uncertainty remains. My old Garmin 76 provided an accuracy estimate on the averaged position; my Oregon 450 does not. If headed out for the weekend I now often check configuation using [url="http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware_ts.asp"]Trimble planning[/url] software. Overkill, but easy to do.
Off the water, huge difference between units. In hiking in the local foothills my old Garmin 76 would almost always acquire a position estimate within a minute or less. I've left my Oregon sitting beside the 76 for 10's of minutes without it ever locking on sufficient no. of satellites to get a position. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> It's all about the type of antenna, the strength of the receiver, the alignment of the satellites, and how clear of a shot you have from the satellite to the antenna.
Most (not all) hiking type GPS units seem to have an antenna and receiver that are optimized to pull in a signal even when under trees.
MY HTC phone is not WAAS enabled and has only OK accuracy. My Garmin GPSMAP 378 is WAAS enabled and fluctuates between 7 and 9 feet accuracy on a constant basis.
My HTC when running the Droid anchor alarm ap will set the alarm off while moving the phone down below when set for a couple of meters. As a plotter, using Navionics it was just as accurate as my Garmin. Had to do a night time icw transit after the Xmas parade, and let me tell you it was driving while blind here. No lit markers for miles.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stinkpotter</i> <br />That's when you want radar--to tell you where the next marker <i>really</i> is. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Pilings, no reflectors... Not a lot to get a ping from.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.