Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
Hey everyone, I spend a lot of time looking at sailboats, reading reviews, and sailing on different models whenever I get a chance. After searching on Google, I realized that there were not very many reviews of our boats even though there's over 6,000 of them out there. So I wrote one. It's located here. http://whichsailboat.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/catalina-25-review/
What do you think? Should I change anything? Do you see any errors or inaccuracies?
Seth, Great write up and thanks for taking the time to do it! Inaccuracies? Keel bolts were not SS on the earlier models and were subject to rusting, SS bolts were used from somewhere in the mid 80's on thus eliminating the problem.
Very thorough, well-thought-out review. I only saw one error that I would mention. In discussing the performance characteristics of the different keels, you said, "There is disagreement among Catalina 25 owners whether the wing keel or the swing keel point to weather better." I think most people here believe both the fin and swinger point better than the wing. I raced my fin keel TR C25 for many years against both winged keels and swingers, and believe that to be true, based on my own observations. Moreover, most racing ratings rank the best overall performance of the different keels with the fin first, the swinger second, and the wing third.* There is some disagreement as to whether the swinger or fin is faster overall, but not much disagreement about the wing. That's not to say, of course, that the wing doesn't offer many fine qualities, but a high pointing angle isn't one of them. Easy launching, shoal draft and low maintenance are their better qualities.
If you would amend the text to say the following, I think most would agree it is accurate: "There is disagreement among Catalina 25 owners whether the fin keel or the swing keel point to weather better."
* Racing ratings vary somewhat because they are based on the race results that are provided to the people who assign the ratings, and, if there is an exceptionally skilled racer who is sailing a wing keel boat exceptionally well, it can skew the rating for that boat under that rating system.
Hey Seth, great write-up. Some minor things you may want to edit/fix:
The mast has one set of spreaders and is supported by three (two) sets of lower shrouds and one set of uppers.
Aft of that space is the ice box, roughly 5 gallons in size, and which can keep a 10lb back (bag) of ice for two days.
In the updated Catalina 25 design, the fuel is in a raised a raised (delete second mention of raised) locker that vents to the outside and has no connection to the bilge.
The anchor locker is large enough to hold an appropriately sized Danforth and plenty of rhode. (rode)
We were recently contacted by Good Old Boat to contribute to an article they will be running in a future issue. I don't think it will run until the fall, I will let you know how it turned out when I see it.
- I would add that Catalina Direct is an independent company not connected to Catalina Yachts.
- "very no blisters." (...what happens when I make revisions.)
- Fin keels up to the early '80s were cast iron with mild steel bolts. Starting around 1983, they were lead encased in fiberglass (to replicate both the weight and the shape of the iron keel), with stainless steel bolts.
- An extra-long (25") shaft outboard is recommended unless the boat is sailed only on a small lake.
- Outboard motor brackets are available also for people who are upgrading to a heavier 4-stroke outboard.
- The total trailering weight (boat and trailer) reported by a number of owners is over 8,000 lbs., which should be considered when comparing to the towing capacity of a particular vehicle.
- The interior wood includes teak-veneered plywood for the bulkheads.
- I'm not aware of wall-to-wall carpeting coming from the factory. I could be wrong...
- The ports in the head were not opening types in the early years. (I think opening ports appeared in the early 80s.)
- The lower, flatter cabin sole appeared starting on the 1989 model, which was after the swing keel had been removed from the line.
- I'd mention that the original stove was pressurized alcohol (which is why it scorched some curtains).
- I haven't seen or heard of a C-25 with two bolts connecting the tiller to the rudder. As far as I know, all tillers can be lifted and, for example, tied to the end-boom mainsheet to clear the cockpit.
- The C-250 was offered with water ballast and a centerboard for lighter-weight trailering, or with a lead wing keel. Some buyers preferred its more open interior and more private, enclosed head.
That's all I noticed... not much for an article of this length and detail.
One correction to your corrections... The C-250 was offered with water ballast or a wing (not fin) keel. They did build a very small number of fins that hardly anyone (except me) has ever seen, and are not worth mentioning.
I still have my original wall-to-wall carpeting in my 1983 swing keel. I'm surprised to see so many bare soles in current boats. How can you live without shag carpeting?
First one is in your Keel section; "When the keel is fully raised in its vertical position..." Shouldn't that be raised in the "horizontal" position? When the keel is vertical it is down. May just be the way I interpret that.
The second one is in your On Deck section; "Beneath the aft end of the port bench is a cockpit cooler..." Mine is on the starboard side.
First one is in your Keel section; "When the keel is fully raised in its vertical position..." Shouldn't that be raised in the "horizontal" position? When the keel is vertical it is down. May just be the way I interpret that.
The second one is in your On Deck section; "Beneath the aft end of the port bench is a cockpit cooler..." Mine is on the starboard side.
Nicely done!
Thanks for those corrections Kyle. I've updated the review with them, and added you to the special thanks at the end. Cheers!
Can someone please answer for me how a 4550lb boat on it's trailer weighs in at 8000lbs? NO flipping way the trailer weighs 3400+lbs. Or does that assume the owner fills it with 2000lbs of garbage?
Can someone please answer for me how a 4550lb boat on it's trailer weighs in at 8000lbs? NO flipping way the trailer weighs 3400+lbs. Or does that assume the owner fills it with 2000lbs of garbage?
John, if you search this forum's archives, you'll find extensive information and discussion about trailering weight. It seems most folks think it reasonable to use a high weight estimate (taking into consideration installed gear and supplies) to make sure you're not overly taxing your tow vehicle.
My C-25 fin keel trailer weighed 1,400 lbs empty. Add 4,550 lbs for the boat and 93 lbs for the motor and you have 6,043 lbs. If one fills the fresh water tank and adds a full 6 gallon fuel tank, that's another 162 lbs. Sails and whisker pole, 70 lbs. Now, we're up to 6,275 lbs. About all that's left is food, clothing, toys, and maybe an inflatable dink/small o/b. So, I would say that 8,000 lbs is extremely high, but 7,000 lbs is a more likely maximum total boat/trailer rig weight.
Unless he had a large quantity of spares, full water and holding tanks - I'm skeptical. There's a gravel yard with a scale not far from our exit. Next time I'm stopping and placing the boat/trailer on their scale - with and without the truck. If 8,500 lbs. is accurate, I'm glad I just moved up to a 3/4t and installed a 12,000 lb. weight carrying hitch.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.