Catalina - Capri - 25s International Assocaition Logo(2006)  
Assn Members Area · Join
Association Forum
Association Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Forum Users | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Catalina/Capri 25/250 Sailor's Forums
 Catalina 250 Specific Forum
 C250 Water Ballast and Wing Keel Headroom Comparis
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

DavidCrosby
Navigator

Member Avatar

USA
229 Posts

Initially Posted - 06/28/2013 :  12:28:40  Show Profile  Visit DavidCrosby's Homepage
I have had these photos kicking around for awhile and finally figured I should get around to posting. They are also now in the C250 gallery.

Before buying my C250WK I searched for an opportunity to do a real comparison between the WK and WB interiors. We found that opportunity four hours away. From the photos, you will be able to tell that it was really cold too.






Edited by - on

britinusa
Web Editor

Members Avatar

USA
5404 Posts

Response Posted - 06/28/2013 :  12:39:01  Show Profile  Visit britinusa's Homepage
Thanks David,
When we purchased our WB, I was sorely tempted to change the order from a WB to a WK.

Expecting that most of our sailing would be in South Florida, specifically Biscayne Bay & the Keys, the shallow draft was the deciding factor.

The extra headroom of the WK was particularly noticeable.

Paul

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

TakeFive
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

2269 Posts

Response Posted - 06/28/2013 :  21:00:43  Show Profile
This confirms my recollection that the difference in headroom is more like 10-12". I didn't want to speak up on the other thread because I wasn't sure memory was accurate. The difference is very large IMO, but some people really need to benefits of the water ballast.

I only went into one water ballast boat, and it felt like there was barely headroom when sitting. Partially standing up was out of the question. Since I sail in a deep river, we focused our search on the WK model. If the fin keel was readily available, we could have easily gone with that since our water is so deep.

<center></center>

This picture confirms why the C250 was designed without side decks. On the WB model, the cabin settees would be uninhabitable without the headroom provided by bumping out the cabin sides. Side decks would have probably been possible with the WK model, but the C250 was designed primarily as a water ballast boat - I think the fixed keel models were an afterthought.

Edited by - TakeFive on 06/28/2013 21:02:09
Go to Top of Page

delliottg
Former Mainsheet C250 Tech Editor

Members Avatar

USA
4479 Posts

Response Posted - 06/28/2013 :  21:12:04  Show Profile  Visit delliottg's Homepage
quote:
This picture confirms why the C250 was designed without side decks. On the WB model, the cabin settees would be uninhabitable without the headroom provided by bumping out the cabin sides. Side decks would have probably been possible with the WK model, but the C250 was designed primarily as a water ballast boat - I think the fixed keel models were an afterthought.


This is one of the things I like least about our boats. I hate making the step down from the cabin top to the cockpit. I've got bad knees (doc wants to replace them), so I'm not very agile, and I always feel out of control making that step down, even holding onto the hand rails. I've been thinking about running jacklines that are tight enough for me to be able to pull up on as I make the step down to help steady myself. If the wind is piped up it makes it particularly scary making that step down. Going up is no big deal, maybe I should try backing down instead of going forward?

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

bear
Admiral

Members Avatar

USA
909 Posts

Response Posted - 06/29/2013 :  04:36:35  Show Profile
Dave, I have the same knee issues. What I do is add two old boat cushions on the settee cushion which cuts about half the distance and affords a soft platform for stepping down.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Arlyn Stewart
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
2980 Posts

Response Posted - 06/29/2013 :  05:15:59  Show Profile  Visit Arlyn Stewart's Homepage
The elimination of the side decks might or might not have been done for interior space considerations. Righting stability may have been the prime driver.

Though they are ugly, the midship stanchion is very functional in aiding moving to and from the coach roof.

Without question for me, the greatest aid to dealing with being on the coach roof is to loose foot the main as the boom then becomes a hand rail. Plus... the main likes it better as well.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

TakeFive
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

2269 Posts

Response Posted - 06/29/2013 :  07:50:54  Show Profile
The reason for eliminating the side decks was never fully apparent to me, but David Crosby's picture really made it SO OBVIOUS that is was so necessary for the water ballast concept to work.

So far the large step up to the cockpit roof hasn't bothered me, but I can see that it might someday. Have any of you thought of glassing in a box step at the base of the cabin bulkhead?

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

delliottg
Former Mainsheet C250 Tech Editor

Members Avatar

USA
4479 Posts

Response Posted - 06/29/2013 :  08:13:32  Show Profile  Visit delliottg's Homepage
I've had that exact thought, problem is, i don't know how, and i don't want it to look like someone was learning how to glass for the first time. Also it needs to be bullet proof.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

CJRoxs
Navigator

Members Avatar

USA
114 Posts

Response Posted - 06/30/2013 :  23:35:01  Show Profile
I just step on the coaming and then up. Works great. Same with on the way down.


Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Stinkpotter
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Djibouti
9013 Posts

Response Posted - 07/01/2013 :  07:19:00  Show Profile
I guess my 5" recollection related to the height between the aft berth and the cockpit sole, as shown. 11" is like a different boat!

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

sreidvt
Deckhand

Members Avatar

USA
16 Posts

Response Posted - 10/05/2014 :  04:11:57  Show Profile
I realize this is an old thread but thank you very much, David, for posting these pictures. We sail primarily in a small lake, with only one shallow-ish public boat ramp, so a WB would make launching much easier. We're on a mooring, though, so once the boat is in it is in for the season. I have a 20' Mirage now (swing keel) and I already have to strap launch that. But I'm going to figure out a way to launch a 250 WK (very long strap and some other creative maneuvering maybe) because the headroom in that boat is wonderful. I looked at one for sale recently and the interior, compared to other boats I've been in that were less than 25 ft, is like a small studio apartment. I have a tall trunk but can actually get in and out of both double berths in the boat without any strange contortions. And, thankfully, the pop top covers a large area so there's plenty of standing room. Overall, I was amazed by the interior in the 250 WK.

Since we're on a mooring (in about 10 feet of water), I figure a day hassling with launching is a good trade for three months of headroom in the boat. But it was seeing your pictures (during a search a few weeks ago) that really cinched my decision. Thanks.

Edited by - sreidvt on 10/05/2014 04:12:41
Go to Top of Page

sdpinaz
Navigator

Members Avatar

USA
193 Posts

Response Posted - 10/05/2014 :  06:16:52  Show Profile
Welcome to the forum Sreidvt,
This is an amazing resource for info and if you do end up getting a Catalina it will be invaluable. A great bunch of people with tons of cumulative knowledge. Good luck on your search for the right boat for you, and welcome again.
Cheers,
Scott

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

sreidvt
Deckhand

Members Avatar

USA
16 Posts

Response Posted - 10/05/2014 :  12:06:55  Show Profile
Thanks very much Scott.

quote:
Originally posted by sdpinaz

Welcome to the forum Sreidvt,
This is an amazing resource for info and if you do end up getting a Catalina it will be invaluable. A great bunch of people with tons of cumulative knowledge. Good luck on your search for the right boat for you, and welcome again.
Cheers,
Scott


Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

DavidCrosby
Navigator

Members Avatar

USA
229 Posts

Response Posted - 10/06/2014 :  16:54:10  Show Profile  Visit DavidCrosby's Homepage
Sreidvt,

Launching the C250WK is not difficult. My C250WK lives on its trailer at a sailing club on Carlyle Lake, IL. The mast is up, sails are on and basically ready to go. I ramp launch anytime I want to use my boat which is pretty much every weekend six months out of the year. I can be either in the water and ready to sail or out and put away for the week in about 25 minutes.

My trailer came with a "stock" 10 foot tongue extension. It was not quite long enough. I had an additional 3 feet welded on the end and it works like a charm. You do need to have a deep enough and long enough ramp.

I wish you the best with your boat choice.

David

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

sreidvt
Deckhand

Members Avatar

USA
16 Posts

Response Posted - 10/07/2014 :  14:56:16  Show Profile
Hi David,

Thanks for the reply. I figured I better just start a thread on this (so as to not hijack this one) so I'll continue here http://www.catalina-capri-25s.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=28721.

Cheers,

Sean

Edited by - sreidvt on 10/07/2014 16:18:45
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Association Forum © since 1999 Catalina Capri 25s International Association Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.